中国南方与西北地区慢性泪囊炎细菌谱的差异
关键词
摘要
全文
文章亮点
1. 关键发现
2. 已知与发现
3. 意义与改变
1 对象和方法
1.1 研究对象
1.2 取材方法
1.3 统计学方法
2 结果
2.1 基线资料
2.2 细菌及真菌培养阳性率
2.3 细菌培养菌株构成
表 1 两地区细菌培养菌株构成比较
Table 1 Comparison of Bacterial Culture Strain Composition in Two Regions
|
南方地区 |
|
西北地区 |
P |
|||||||
|
细菌 |
菌株数 |
构成比/% |
|
菌株数 |
构成比/% |
|||||
|
G+球菌 |
39 |
45.9 |
|
30 |
71.4 |
7.390 |
0.007 |
|||
|
凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌 |
20 |
23.5 |
|
14 |
33.3 |
|
|
|||
|
链球菌属 |
13 |
15.3 |
|
13 |
31.0 |
4.233 |
0.039 |
|||
|
金黄色葡萄球菌 |
5 |
5.9 |
|
3 |
7.1 |
|
|
|||
|
其他G+球菌 |
1 |
1.2 |
|
0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
G+杆菌 |
7 |
8.2 |
|
3 |
7.1 |
0.046 |
0.829 |
|||
|
G-球菌 |
7 |
8.2 |
|
1 |
2.4 |
1.632 |
0.201 |
|||
|
G-杆菌 |
32 |
37.6 |
|
8 |
19.0 |
4.507 |
0.003 |
|||
|
铜绿假单胞菌 |
8 |
9.4 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|||
|
克雷伯菌属 |
4 |
4.7 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|||
|
嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌 |
5 |
5.9 |
|
1 |
0.4 |
|
|
|||
|
嗜血杆菌属 |
1 |
1.2 |
|
3 |
7.1 |
|
|
|||
|
肠杆菌属 |
2 |
0.4 |
|
2 |
4.8 |
|
|
|||
|
其他G-杆菌 |
12 |
14.1 |
|
2 |
4.8 |
|
|
|||
|
总计 |
85 |
100.0 |
|
42 |
100.0 |
|
|
|||
G+为革兰阳性,G-为革兰阴性。
G+ stands for Gram-positive, and G- stands for Gram-negative.
3 讨论
表 2 国内外其他慢性泪囊炎泪道分泌物培养研究
Table 2 Lacrimal Duct Secretion Culture of Chronic Dacryocystitis in Other Studies
|
作者 |
研究年份 |
地区 |
停用抗生素 |
取材方式 |
阳性率/% |
细菌类型 |
主要细菌类型 |
|
Coden等[6] |
1984.1-1988.12 |
曼哈顿 |
/ |
泪点拭子或切开泪囊 |
5.5 |
G+菌:64.5%;G-菌:27.3%;厌氧菌:7.0%;真菌:1.2% |
表皮葡萄球菌:27.3%;金黄色葡萄球菌:0.1%;流感嗜血杆菌:5.8%;铜绿假单胞菌:8.7% |
|
Chaudhry等[7] |
1999.1-2002.3 |
沙特阿拉伯 |
是 |
挤压泪囊反流或切开泪囊 |
97.3 |
G+菌:5.7%;G-菌:25.8%;厌氧菌:19.1%;真菌:1.0% |
表皮葡萄球菌:15.2%;金黄色葡萄球菌:1.0%;流感嗜血杆菌:9.0%;铜绿假单胞菌:4.5% |
|
Bharathi等[8] |
2000.1-2005.12 |
印度 |
/ |
挤压泪囊反流 |
90.0 |
/ |
凝血酶阴性葡萄球菌:44.2%;金黄色葡萄球菌:10.8%;肺炎链球菌:10% |
|
Mills等[9] |
2005.3-2006.3 |
北美 |
/ |
挤压泪囊反流或切开泪囊 |
/ |
金黄色葡萄球菌:24.6%;凝血酶阴性葡萄球菌:17.5%;链球菌属:10.5%;铜绿假单胞菌:1.3% |
|
|
Chaudhary等[10] |
2008.8-2009.1 |
尼泊尔 |
/ |
泪道冲洗反流 |
7.7 |
/ |
凝血酶阴性葡萄球菌:34.0%;金黄色葡萄球菌:25.5%;肺炎链球菌:19.8% |
|
Pornpanich等[11] |
2008.8-2011.4 |
泰国 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
8.2 |
凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌:17.3%;铜绿假单胞菌:9.4%;金黄色葡萄球菌:6.3%;流感嗜血杆菌:8.7% |
|
|
Eslami等[12] |
2016-2017 |
伊朗 |
/ |
/ |
68.2 |
/ |
表皮葡萄球菌:25.9%;铜绿假单胞菌:15.5%;金黄色葡萄球菌及念珠菌:10.3%;肺炎链球菌:6.9% |
|
Sun等[13] |
2002.4-2003.2 |
北京 |
是 |
泪道冲洗或挤压泪囊反流 |
85.0 |
表皮葡萄球菌:26.1%;金黄色葡萄球菌:5.6%;肺炎链球菌:5.5%;丙酸菌属:5.0% |
|
|
刘先宁等[14] |
2008.6-2009.6 |
西安 |
/ |
挤压泪囊反流 |
98.0 |
G+球:54.0%;G+杆:14.0%;G-球:4.0%;G-杆:28.0% |
表皮葡萄球菌:44.0%;假单胞菌属:16.0%;类白喉杆菌:10.0%;草绿色链球菌:.0% |
|
刘广川等[15] |
2009.5-2013.4 |
内蒙古 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
97.0 |
G+球:57.0%;G+杆:17.0%;G-球:0.0%;G-杆:24.0% |
表皮葡萄球菌:57.0%;大肠埃希菌:8.0% |
|
张凤梅等[16] |
2010.1-2012.12 |
邢台 |
是 |
挤压泪囊反流 |
87.8 |
G+球:6.9%;G+杆:15.1%;G-球:0.6%;G-杆:17.6%;真菌:0.6% |
凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌:34.0%;链球菌属:25.8% |
|
刘艳丽等[18] |
2010.1-2015.1 |
天津 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
6.8 |
G+球:7.5%;G+杆:0.0%;G-球:1.0%;G-杆:21.4%;真菌:0.0% |
凝血酶阴性葡萄球菌:38.8%;金黄色葡萄球菌:4.1%;肺炎链球菌:0.1%;铜绿假单胞菌:6.1% |
|
付棪等[19] |
2012.12-2014.12 |
杭州 |
/ |
注射器经泪点抽吸分泌物 |
7.9 |
G+菌:65.6%;G-菌:34.4%;真菌:0.2% |
凝血酶阴性葡萄球菌:0.3%;金黄色葡萄球菌:21.9%;铜绿假单胞菌:16.7% |
|
谢杨杨等[17] |
2013.4-2014.4 |
武汉 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
76.6 |
G+球:7.5%;G+杆:0.8%;G-球:0.8%;G-杆:21.4%;真菌:1.5% |
人葡萄球菌:27.5%;表皮葡萄球菌:16.8%;草绿色链球菌:1.0% |
|
黄豫鄂等[20] |
2013.12-2015.12 |
信阳 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
84.2 |
G+球:7.3%;G+杆:4.0%;G-球:0.0%;G-杆:17.8%;真菌:0.0% |
/ |
|
张道远等[21] |
2017.5-2017.11 |
西宁 |
是 |
泪道冲洗反流 |
88.8 |
G+球:59.2%;G+杆:4.2%;G-球:8.5%;G-杆:25.4%;真菌:0.8% |
/ |
利益冲突
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突。开放获取声明
基金
This work was supported by Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project. (No. 2024A04J4489)
参考文献
Tao H, Ma ZZ, Hou SK, et al. Current advance on diagnosis of lacrimal duct obstruction diseases[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2009, 9(2): 342-346. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5123.2009.02.042.
Liu XN, Lan YX, Yang H, et al. Predominant pathogenic bacteria and drug resistance of patients with chronic dacryocystitis[ J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2010, 10(2): 400-401. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672- 5123.2010.02.076.
Liu GC, Duan YC, Shang CP, et al. Clinical observation of pathogenic bacteria 63 cases of chronic dacryocystitis[ J]. Inn Mong Med J, 2014, 46(7): 798-800. DOI: 10.16096/j.cnki.nmgyxzz.2014.07.054.
Zhang FM, Shang YX, Feng L. Chin Remedies Clin, 2014, 14(6): 850-852. DOI: 10.11655/zgywylc2014.06.074.
Xie YY, Han XL, Lei R, et al. Pathogens distribution and drug sensitivity of chronic dacryocystitis[J]. Int Eye Sci, 2014, 14(10): 1892-1894. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.10.46.
Liu YL, Zhao KX, Yu JG, et al. Pathogenic bacterial distribution and drug sensitive test results for patients with chronic dacryocystitis[ J]. Chin J Nosocomiology, 2016, 26(4): 895-897. DOI: 10.11816/ cn.ni.2016-151610.
Fu Y. Study on pathogenesis and drug sensitivity of chronic dacryocystitis[J]. Chin Rural Health Serv Adm, 2015, 35(11): 1491-1493.
HUANG YE. Analysis of chronic dacryocystitis pathogens distribution and drug sensitivity[J]. J Med Forum, 2017, 38(4): 63-64.
Zhang DY. Distribution and drug sensitivity analysis of pathogenic bacteria in chronic dacryocystitis[J]. Mod Med Health Res, 2018, 2(3): 83.
Fan XQ. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery[M]. Beijing: Beijing Science &Technology Press, 2009.
Shi Yingxin, Zou Chunna, Qu Tao, et al. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Anti - Infective Pharmacy, 2022, 19(06): 835 - 839. DOI: 10.13493/j.issn.1672- 7878. 2022.06 - 016.
Shi MH, Hu N, Chu SP, et al. Influence of the seasons to the conjunctival bacteria[ J]. J Clin Ophthalmol, 2008, 16(1): 47-49. DOI: 10.3969/ j.issn.1006-8422.2008.01.016.
Xie MH, Qu ZX, Wang BS. Bacterial culture report of lacrimal sac retention substances in 70 cases[ J]. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, 1996, 16(2): 84. DOI: CNKI:SUN:XKJZ.0.1996-02- 010.
Zhou F, Huo ZM. Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity analysis of lacrimal sac secretion in 109 patients with dacryocystitis[ J]. Wuhan Med J, 1996(4): 248.
Xiang YJ, Liu YY, Tao Y, et al. Survey of conjunctival sac bacterial status in the age-related cataract patients of Uygur in Xinjiang area[ J/OL]. Chin J Ophthalmol Med(Electron Ed), 2016, 6(6): 254-259. DOI: 10.3877/cma. j.issn.2095-2007.2016.06.003.
Song L, Yao CH, Wei WB, et al. Investigation and anaIysis of bacteriaI spectrum and drug sensitivity test in conjunctivaI sac of cataract patients of Kazak[ J]. Int Eye Sci, 2015, 15(3): 528-530. DOI: 10.3980/ j.issn.1672-5123.2015.3.40.